
We are all aware that the movie Dam 999 caused a lot of fuss and the screening was banned by the Tamil Nadu government. One thing the world can learn from Indians. Thats the way of doing politics. No power on this planet can ever top Indians in politicizing things for their personal gain. The politicians especially in TN talk a lot about Mullaiperiyar Dam but i doubt if they really knew what they were talking.
We all should understand the fact that the Mullaiperiyar Dam is located well inside Kerala state but is operated by the TN Govt. What an irony??!!!! Isn't it??!!!! Yes, way back in 1890's the British forced the then King of Travancore to sign a lease contract allowing the Govt of Madras Province to construct and maintain a dam at the site for a period of 999 years. We all should understand the fact that all the agreements signed by the British were declared null and void once India attained her Independence. But then a questions arises why TN still allowed to own and operate the Dam. I'll come to it later. Before that a few facts. Periyar is a west flowing river and the Dam is located at the confluence of Periyar and Mullaiyar, Periyar's tributary and hence the name Mullaiperiyar Dam. Water is diverted eastwards from the Dam through tunnels and join the Vaigai river is TN and provides water to Madurai, Theni, Ramanathapuram, SIvagangai districts in TN. Theres a hydel power plant also which provides power to TN. TN in turn pays for using the land to construct the dam and sur charge for the power generated. Though, officially the lease expired in 1947, both the states resigned the lease agreement in 1970 and it expired in 2000 but TN still continues to use the Dam. One should also remember that the catchment areas of the river include Idukki, Kottayam, Ernakulam, Alappuzha and Trissur with a population of more than a million. Now the TN govt in proposing to increase the capacity by 6ft to 142ft from the current 136ft. The full capacity of the dam is 152ft. Initially Kerala govt agreed to 142ft but safety concerns were raised after a minor earth quake damaged the dam a bit with cracks visibly seen. So the storage was reduced to 136ft. After repair works by TN govt and approval from Supreme Court, TN proposed to increase the storage back to 142ft but the Kerala govt opposed to this citing safety of people down stream. One should understand the fact that a report says that the Dam would not withstand an earthquake of 6 in Richter Scale.
We all should remember that the Kerala govt is not against giving water to TN. We can still come to a solution acceptable by both the states. We should try to address the concerns of both the states. The Central Govt should play the role of mediator and help the states arrive an a amicable solution. I don't want to suggest any solutions as it may affect the sentiments of people living in these states. But two things we should consider before coming to a conclution- lives of millions of people living downstream and lives of millions of farmers and their families living in the arid districts of TN and to whom the waters from this river acts as a lifeline.
I would like to quote the letters of the English magazine, Frontline which says, "For every argument raised by Tamil Nadu in support of its claims, there is counter-argument in Kerala that appears equally plausible. Yet, each time the controversy gets embroiled in extraneous issues, two things stand out: One is Kerala's refusal to acknowledge the genuine need of the farmers in the otherwise drought-prone regions of Tamil Nadu for the waters of the Mullaperiyar; the other is Tamil Nadu's refusal to see that it cannot rely on or continue to expect more and more from the resources of an other State to satisfy its own requirements to the detriment of the other State. A solution perhaps lies in acknowledging the two truths, but neither government can afford the political repercussions of such a confession".
We all should understand the fact that the Mullaiperiyar Dam is located well inside Kerala state but is operated by the TN Govt. What an irony??!!!! Isn't it??!!!! Yes, way back in 1890's the British forced the then King of Travancore to sign a lease contract allowing the Govt of Madras Province to construct and maintain a dam at the site for a period of 999 years. We all should understand the fact that all the agreements signed by the British were declared null and void once India attained her Independence. But then a questions arises why TN still allowed to own and operate the Dam. I'll come to it later. Before that a few facts. Periyar is a west flowing river and the Dam is located at the confluence of Periyar and Mullaiyar, Periyar's tributary and hence the name Mullaiperiyar Dam. Water is diverted eastwards from the Dam through tunnels and join the Vaigai river is TN and provides water to Madurai, Theni, Ramanathapuram, SIvagangai districts in TN. Theres a hydel power plant also which provides power to TN. TN in turn pays for using the land to construct the dam and sur charge for the power generated. Though, officially the lease expired in 1947, both the states resigned the lease agreement in 1970 and it expired in 2000 but TN still continues to use the Dam. One should also remember that the catchment areas of the river include Idukki, Kottayam, Ernakulam, Alappuzha and Trissur with a population of more than a million. Now the TN govt in proposing to increase the capacity by 6ft to 142ft from the current 136ft. The full capacity of the dam is 152ft. Initially Kerala govt agreed to 142ft but safety concerns were raised after a minor earth quake damaged the dam a bit with cracks visibly seen. So the storage was reduced to 136ft. After repair works by TN govt and approval from Supreme Court, TN proposed to increase the storage back to 142ft but the Kerala govt opposed to this citing safety of people down stream. One should understand the fact that a report says that the Dam would not withstand an earthquake of 6 in Richter Scale.
We all should remember that the Kerala govt is not against giving water to TN. We can still come to a solution acceptable by both the states. We should try to address the concerns of both the states. The Central Govt should play the role of mediator and help the states arrive an a amicable solution. I don't want to suggest any solutions as it may affect the sentiments of people living in these states. But two things we should consider before coming to a conclution- lives of millions of people living downstream and lives of millions of farmers and their families living in the arid districts of TN and to whom the waters from this river acts as a lifeline.
I would like to quote the letters of the English magazine, Frontline which says, "For every argument raised by Tamil Nadu in support of its claims, there is counter-argument in Kerala that appears equally plausible. Yet, each time the controversy gets embroiled in extraneous issues, two things stand out: One is Kerala's refusal to acknowledge the genuine need of the farmers in the otherwise drought-prone regions of Tamil Nadu for the waters of the Mullaperiyar; the other is Tamil Nadu's refusal to see that it cannot rely on or continue to expect more and more from the resources of an other State to satisfy its own requirements to the detriment of the other State. A solution perhaps lies in acknowledging the two truths, but neither government can afford the political repercussions of such a confession".
